The legitimacy of Iran's retaliatory attack on Israel - 2

 Retaliatory attack of Iran on Israel

Retaliatory attack of Iran on Israel:

Click to Previous Part

Because the teachings of Islam are natural and compatible with the nature of free human beings, these teachings have also been associated and emerged in international laws. For example, retaliatory attack is also stated in the United Nations Charter as follows:

 Article 2 (4) of UN Charter:

“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”[1]

Article 51 of UN Charter:

“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations...”[2]

The goal of Iran's retaliatory operation against Israel:

Although Iran hit two of Israel's main military bases in this attack with its missiles and caused significant damage to them,[3] Iran's main goal was to create horor in the hearts of the leaders of the occupying regime so that they would not commit more mistakes against Iran in the future.

Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps used its most primary military capacity in response to Israel.

The horror it had to create was done in the best possible way.

The IRGC strategists knew that most attacks were repelled by such an attack, but the horror of the sky and the earth was widespread.

Naturally, if the purpose of the Corps was a full -fledged war, they used hypersonic missiles to Israeli Atomic centers or marine bombs to create a large tsunami.

Mainly, it was a horror scenario, now if Israel wants to retaliate, war and definitive destructions will begin that time.